Evaluates (ACRL 3, SCONUL 5, ANZIL 3, ANCIL 4)

Submitted by Lauren deLaubell on January 17th, 2025
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The most powerful wizards have gathered to battle one another.  Only one will win.  Wizards must use reliable sources to research incantations for the battle, or their spells will fizzle.  Truly wise wizards must learn to tell the difference. 

Research Wizards is an information literacy card game designed to teach students ages 12+ about source evaluation.  Research Wizards corresponds to the Frame Authority Is Constructed and Contextual, from the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.  Players will discuss and challenge the relative value of various sources, each representing a different suit in the game.  The game includes four major actions/phases:  Parley, when players discuss and decide for themselves the relative value of each suit; Battle, which includes competition, player actions, and Challenges; Vengeance, for eliminated players to impact and speed up the remainder of the game; and Victory.

The Research Wizards website contains free game files, player directions, and printing tips for librarians and teachers who wish to use the game in their classrooms.  The website includes an editable, Microsoft Publisher version of the game.  Noncommercial use of the game is free for educational purposes with attribution to the author.  Librarians and teachers are encouraged to adapt the game as needed for their subject areas, student needs, and as the sources in the game evolve over time.  Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.

Players:  3-5 per deck

Play Time:  20-30 minutes, plus discussion

Research Wizards by Lauren deLaubell is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0  To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Player directionsdisplayed 376 times1.02 MB
Printing tipsdisplayed 298 times26.71 KB
Card deckdisplayed 324 times2.51 MB
Learning Outcomes: 
    • Wizards will define a variety of traditional and emerging information formats.
    • Wizards will compare a variety of information formats and discuss their relative reliability.
    • Wizards will explore the variation in quality found within specific categories of information (e.g., the wildcard of using resources located by or generated with artificial intelligence).

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It is recommended to review directions out loud with students, with pauses for students to sort their decks and conduct the Parley phase of play.  To contextualize and reinforce learning, it is recommended to conclude the game with discussion questions; sample questions are provided at the bottom of the player directions file but may be adjusted as needed.

Suggested Citation: 
deLaubell, Lauren. "Research Wizards." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2025. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-wizards.
Submitted by Ariel Dyer on November 18th, 2024
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Play-based learning activity asking students to intentionally create "fake news" and engage with their emotional reactions in coming across information. 

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Evaluate news using the SIFT rubric
  • Select relevant misinformation tools and apply to misleading information
  • Create misinformation in order to understand its proliferation

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Recommendations for adaptation:

  • -Prior introduction to AI tools
  • -Stronger parameters for discussion post (set the scene)
Suggested Citation: 
Dyer, Ariel. "Faking Breaking News." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/faking-breaking-news.
Submitted by Olga Koz on October 14th, 2024
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The literature review design (LRD) tool helps design a traditional review nested in the dissertation or thesis. It was created based on the interactive Hopscotch research design framework (Jorrin-Abellan, 2020). 

  • Students are asked to answer questions in the LRD form and engage with resources in the Guide to LRD. 
  • Students may stop working on the form (after steps 3, 5, and 6) and submit preliminary results (Save & Submit).
  •  Ultimately, they will receive the graphical representation of the literature review (table) and literature review protocol. 
Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
LRD Form_Graphic_24.docxdisplayed 275 times366 KB
AttachmentSize
TLED9900LR-Syllabus-Summer 2024.docxdisplayed 684 times91.78 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • Evaluate the role that literature review has in planning research.
  • Differentiate between the types/genres of literature reviews, their methodology, strengths, limitations, and sources of bias, and select the appropriate type of review.
  • Distinguish between the types and levels of evidence/literature/publications and select the appropriate ones for review.
  • Develop and apply the systematic literature-searching strategy and the protocol for evidence collection.
  • Frame the proposed research theoretically and conceptually
  • Reveal research, conceptual, and methodological gaps.
  • Sharpen critical thinking skills while analyzing and appraising evidence.
  • Synthesize the literature analysis results to inform your study's research questions, design, and framework.
  • Submit the draft of the literature review for a dissertation proposal or Chapter 2 of the dissertation.
Discipline: 
Education

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

The LRD tool was a formative and summative assignment for the course "Literature review for Ed.D. students." Each step in designing the literature review protocol included various activities ( watching a video tutorial, answering questions, or attending search and analysis sessions.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

The course syllabus includes activities (video and other self-paced tutorials, working on the interactive form, AI applications).

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
LR_Rubric.docxdisplayed 230 times21.3 KB
Assessment Short Description: 
Literature Review rubrics
Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Koz, Olga. "Dissertation's Literature Review." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/dissertations-literature-review.
Submitted by Alessandra Otero-Ramos on January 26th, 2024
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This library class was designed for the courses Scene Design and Technical Theatre. However, it can be adapted and used for courses that make use of digital archives and other types of digital objects to support their arguments.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Visual Research Lesson Plan_SUNY Geneseo_Otero .pdfdisplayed 577 times62.06 KB
Visual Research_Scene Design_Worksheet.pdfdisplayed 435 times251.12 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
  • By the end of this class, 
    • (1) Students will be able to find reliable and high-quality images of their chosen topic. 
    • (2) Students will be able to critically evaluate the images for their visual research assignment. 

Individual or Group:

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

I taught this class for THEA 342: Scene Design. The students were asked to work on a visual research project consisting of a presentation based on their chosen architectural style (e.g. art deco, gothic) and its history. Following the presentation the students builded a model making project based on the visual research done for it. 

Suggested Citation: 
Otero-Ramos, Alessandra. "Pictorial Research: Finding and Choosing the Best Images for Your Project ." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2024. https://projectcora.org/assignment/pictorial-research-finding-and-choosing-best-images-your-project.
Submitted by Sarah Hartman-Caverly on December 20th, 2023
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The Hidden Layer Workshop introduces key generative AI (genAI) concepts through a privacy lens. Participants probe the possibilities and limitations of genAI while considering implications for intellectual privacy, intellectual property, data sovereignty, and human agency. In the centerpiece activity, participants engage in a hidden layer simulation to develop a conceptual understanding of the algorithms in the neural networks underlying LLMs and their implications for machine bias and AI hallucination. Drawing on Richards’s theory of intellectual privacy (2015) and the movement for data sovereignty, and introducing an original framework for the ethical evaluation of AI, Hidden Layer prepares participants to be critical users of genAI and synthetic media.

The workshop is designed for a 60-minute session, but can be extended to fill the time available.
Includes workshop guide, presentation slides, learning activities, and assessment instrument.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
HiddenLayer_LessonPlan_CCBYSA_HartmanCaverly_2023.pdfdisplayed 863 times117.63 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Facilitator learning objectives

During this workshop, participants will

  • Apply prompt engineering techniques to elicit information from text-to-text generative AI (genAI) platforms

  • Appreciate a range of intellectual privacy implications posed by genAI, including: 

    • personal data;

    • intellectual property (copyright, patent, proprietary and sensitive data); 

    • AI alignment (social bias, content moderation, AI guardrails, censorship, prompt injection); 

    • synthetic media;

    • AI hallucination and mis/dis/malinformation; and

    • data sovereignty and data colonialism.

  • Engage in a simulation to develop a conceptual understanding of how the hidden layer in the neural networks underpinning large language models works

  • Synthesize their knowledge of genAI intellectual privacy considerations to analyze an ethical case study using the Agent-Impact Matrix for Artificial Intelligence (AIM4AI).

Participant learning outcomes

During this workshop, participants will

  • Interact with genAI to explore its possibilities and limitations

  • Discuss the intellectual privacy implications of genAI, including intellectual property considerations

  • Evaluate the ethics of genAI for its impact on human agency

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Hartman-Caverly, Sarah. "Hidden Layer: Intellectual Privacy and Generative AI." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/hidden-layer-intellectual-privacy-and-generative-ai.
Submitted by Michelle Keba Knecht on May 23rd, 2023
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this session, first year medical students in their second semester of study are introduced to the concept of critical appraisal. During the first hour, students will receive an introductory lecture on critical appraisal and the CASP checklist tool. During the second hour, students will be provided with discussion questions and an article on labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. Students will review the article and answer the discussion questions in their small groups with their small group facilitators.

The session introduces critical appraisal topics including blinding, randomization, concealment allocation, intention-to-treat analysis, power, statistical significance, and clinical significance.

This lesson is one component of the Evidence Based Medicine Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Education at Florida Atlantic University.

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Recognize basic statistical and epidemiologic principles and methods in a randomized control trial.
  • Critically appraise a randomized control trial that is published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Discipline: 
Health

Individual or Group:

Suggested Citation: 
Keba Knecht, Michelle. "Introduction to Critical Appraisal for Medical Students." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/introduction-critical-appraisal-medical-students.
Submitted by Kelleen Maluski on January 20th, 2023
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The sixth in a series of 6 courses, students focus on the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Plan involving prescription medications, patient history, and more complex patient cases. The librarian has already met with these students in other courses so this is and scaffolded approach with this being their last session with the librarian. The purpose of the librarian session is to make sure they feel comfortable doing advanced research on drug information pertaining to specific topics that will be communicated to patients. In a previous session the librarian covered disparities and discrimination in both search engines and scholarly databases so this is to reinforce those lessons. The session starts with a brief Kahoot quiz (with prizes for winners) and discussion of any sticking points that become clear through this quiz. This is to allow students to teach and learn from each other and to assess their needs as opposed to assuming what they might be needing reinforcement on. Then the students break out into groups to create a patient education zine on smoking cessation for members of the LGBTQ2S+ communities. The zine has to have at least 2 background sources, 1 scholarly article, and 1 drug information portal source. All sources have to be cited in correct APA format. There also has to be at least one page where the group communicates to the patients how they found this information (in otherwords their search strategy). At the end of the class there is about 20 minutes set aside for the groups to present on their zines, what information they included, and why. The librarian makes copies of the zines for all members of the class afterwards, thus helping to build intrinsic motivation for sharing with their cohorts. The librarian for this course pre-makes the zine booklets and brings all supplies for making zines (such as markers, glue sticks, scissors, paper, magazines to cut up, etc.)

Learning Outcomes: 

Reinforce concepts reviewed in previous classes while allowing students to teach each other and come away with a learning object they have built.

Discipline: 
Health

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This is the 3rd in a series of scaffolded classes for pharmacy students

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

Will need to provide supplies and that obviously requires a budget. Also need knowledge on how to make zines. 

Suggested Citation: 
Maluski, Kelleen. "Reinforcement of Cultural Humility in Searching and Patient Communications." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2023. https://projectcora.org/assignment/reinforcement-cultural-humility-searching-and-patient-communications.
Submitted by Gina Trask on March 24th, 2022
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This lesson actively engages learners in the process of evaluating an information source using the SIFT technique, designed by Mike Caufield. The approach uses lateral reading techniques and the lesson encourages learners to apply and reflect on the technique as it pertains to a specific information need.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Activitydisplayed 1338 times27.11 KB
Example scenarios of information needs for the activitydisplayed 1400 times84.89 KB
Lesson plandisplayed 1599 times101.13 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Learners will be able to evaluate a website or online source to determine if it is appropriate to use for a specific information need.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson has been taught for multiple audiences: first-year and senior college students for a specific course assignment, as a drop-in virtual workshop with college students of all levels, and as a continuing education workshop with public school educators. The lesson has also be adapted as an asynchronous module in a learning management system.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Caulfield, M. (2019, June 19). SIFT (The Four Moves). Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/

Caulfield, M. (2017). Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers. https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/

Lesson materials adapted from: Citizen Literacy by Robert Detmering, Amber Willenborg, and Terri Holtze for University of Louisville Libraries is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

 

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Rubric for Activitydisplayed 918 times81.95 KB
Assessment Short Description: 
The activity for this lesson serves as the assessment. The rubric can be used to assess the competency of the learners in regards to the SIFT technique. It may be appropriate for some learners to be at the "beginner" or "developing" stage and for others to aim for "exemplary" stage.
Suggested Citation: 
Trask, Gina. "Source Evaluation via SIFT Technique." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2022. https://projectcora.org/assignment/source-evaluation-sift-technique.
Submitted by Eric Kowalik on March 2nd, 2022
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

In this scenario based activity, students are asked to help 4 of their classmates evaluate 3 sources they are considering using for their paper. Students can read the entirety of each source, then write a 2 to 3 sentence explanation of why their classmate should or shouldn’t use the source and why. Based on the concept of Calibrated Peer Review, there is one exemplar source, one substandard source and one bubble source.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will evaulate 3 sources to determine the one exemplar source, the one substandard source and the one bubble source.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 
Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

https://marquetterml.github.io/information-literacy-modules/

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 
Suggested Citation: 
Kowalik, Eric. "Evaluating Sources." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2022. https://projectcora.org/assignment/evaluating-sources.
Submitted by Kelly Drifmeyer on February 7th, 2022
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Embedded library modules in online, stand-alone website used by second semester English Composition classes for freshman level students.  This set of modules is co-authored with Mario Leyva, Assistant Director, Instruction and User Services at Our Lady of the Lake University, and Forrest Davidson. All coursework and assignments are available for download; quizzes available upon request.

Learning Outcomes: 

Library Learning Outcomes 1.) The student will be able to develop and apply keywords to conduct iterative Boolean searching in a library database. 2.) The student will be able to differentiate types of sources by analyzing the need and purposes of information sources. 3.) The student will be able to locate and choose sources based on their specific subject needs. 4.)The student will be able to analyze and critique information sources by applying evaluation criteria. 5.) The student will be able to accurately compose and / or edit a scholarly citation in their assigned citation style.

Individual or Group:

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Drifmeyer, Kelly. "Academic Library Information Literacy Modules: First year / freshman embedded coursework." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2022. https://projectcora.org/assignment/academic-library-information-literacy-modules-first-year-freshman-embedded-coursework.

Pages