Liberal Studies

Submitted by Lauren deLaubell on January 17th, 2025
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

The most powerful wizards have gathered to battle one another.  Only one will win.  Wizards must use reliable sources to research incantations for the battle, or their spells will fizzle.  Truly wise wizards must learn to tell the difference. 

Research Wizards is an information literacy card game designed to teach students ages 12+ about source evaluation.  Research Wizards corresponds to the Frame Authority Is Constructed and Contextual, from the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.  Players will discuss and challenge the relative value of various sources, each representing a different suit in the game.  The game includes four major actions/phases:  Parley, when players discuss and decide for themselves the relative value of each suit; Battle, which includes competition, player actions, and Challenges; Vengeance, for eliminated players to impact and speed up the remainder of the game; and Victory.

The Research Wizards website contains free game files, player directions, and printing tips for librarians and teachers who wish to use the game in their classrooms.  The website includes an editable, Microsoft Publisher version of the game.  Noncommercial use of the game is free for educational purposes with attribution to the author.  Librarians and teachers are encouraged to adapt the game as needed for their subject areas, student needs, and as the sources in the game evolve over time.  Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.

Players:  3-5 per deck

Play Time:  20-30 minutes, plus discussion

Research Wizards by Lauren deLaubell is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0  To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Player directionsdisplayed 1592 times1.02 MB
Printing tipsdisplayed 1509 times26.71 KB
Card deckdisplayed 1550 times2.51 MB
Learning Outcomes: 
    • Wizards will define a variety of traditional and emerging information formats.
    • Wizards will compare a variety of information formats and discuss their relative reliability.
    • Wizards will explore the variation in quality found within specific categories of information (e.g., the wildcard of using resources located by or generated with artificial intelligence).

Individual or Group:

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

It is recommended to review directions out loud with students, with pauses for students to sort their decks and conduct the Parley phase of play.  To contextualize and reinforce learning, it is recommended to conclude the game with discussion questions; sample questions are provided at the bottom of the player directions file but may be adjusted as needed.

Suggested Citation: 
deLaubell, Lauren. "Research Wizards." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2025. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-wizards.
Submitted by Gina Trask on March 24th, 2022
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This lesson actively engages learners in the process of evaluating an information source using the SIFT technique, designed by Mike Caufield. The approach uses lateral reading techniques and the lesson encourages learners to apply and reflect on the technique as it pertains to a specific information need.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Activitydisplayed 1598 times27.11 KB
Example scenarios of information needs for the activitydisplayed 1662 times84.89 KB
Lesson plandisplayed 1865 times101.13 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Learners will be able to evaluate a website or online source to determine if it is appropriate to use for a specific information need.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson has been taught for multiple audiences: first-year and senior college students for a specific course assignment, as a drop-in virtual workshop with college students of all levels, and as a continuing education workshop with public school educators. The lesson has also be adapted as an asynchronous module in a learning management system.

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Caulfield, M. (2019, June 19). SIFT (The Four Moves). Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/

Caulfield, M. (2017). Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers. https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/

Lesson materials adapted from: Citizen Literacy by Robert Detmering, Amber Willenborg, and Terri Holtze for University of Louisville Libraries is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

 

Assessment or Criteria for Success
(e.g. rubric, guidelines, exemplary sample paper, etc.): 
AttachmentSize
Rubric for Activitydisplayed 1175 times81.95 KB
Assessment Short Description: 
The activity for this lesson serves as the assessment. The rubric can be used to assess the competency of the learners in regards to the SIFT technique. It may be appropriate for some learners to be at the "beginner" or "developing" stage and for others to aim for "exemplary" stage.
Suggested Citation: 
Trask, Gina. "Source Evaluation via SIFT Technique." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2022. https://projectcora.org/assignment/source-evaluation-sift-technique.
Submitted by Nicole Hennig on September 8th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Use this virtual mind-map to focus a topic and generate keywords for searching.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will come up with synonyms for their topic keywords and combine them in a Boolean search.

Individual or Group:

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hennig, Nicole. "Mind Mapping for Focusing Your Topic." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/mind-mapping-focusing-your-topic.
Submitted by Nicole Hennig on September 8th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Learn how to read a scholarly article and identify the parts.

Learning Outcomes: 

The student will learn to identify each section of a scholarly paper and understand its purpose.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This tutorial can serve as a stand-alone tutorial or can be used in the flipped classroom.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hennig, Nicole. "Anatomy of a Scholarly Article." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/anatomy-scholarly-article.
Submitted by Nicole Hennig on September 8th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

It's important to credit others when you use parts of their work. Complete this tutorial to learn when and how to best give credit to the work of others.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will learn why it's important to give credit.

Information Literacy concepts:

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This tutorial and optional assignment can serve as a stand alone tutorial or can be used in the flipped classroom.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hennig, Nicole. "How Do I Give Credit to the Ideas of Others?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/how-do-i-give-credit-ideas-others.
Submitted by Nicole Hennig on September 8th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Searching for information in library resources is often like exploring a new land. You often won’t find what you're looking for the first time you search. Complete this tutorial to learn strategies for rethinking your search for better results.

Learning Outcomes: 

Students will learn ways to revise a search that isn't working the first time.

Individual or Group:

Tags:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This tutorial and optional assignment can serve as a stand alone tutorial or can be used in the flipped classroom.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hennig, Nicole. "Should I Rethink My Search?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/should-i-rethink-my-search.
Submitted by Nicole Hennig on September 8th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Library databases work differently from Google. Learn how to create a search strategy for these databases.

Learning Outcomes: 
  • Students will learn how searching Google is different from searching library databases.
  • Students will learn how and why to plan a search strategy.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This tutorial and optional assignment can serve as a stand alone tutorial or can be used in the flipped classroom.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hennig, Nicole. "How Do I Create a Search Strategy?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/how-do-i-create-search-strategy.
Submitted by Nicole Hennig on September 8th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Understand the difference between primary and secondary sources, and between popular and scholarly sources.

Learning Outcomes: 

    Know the difference between primary and secondary sources.
    Understand that the same source can sometimes be used as either a primary or secondary source.
    Know the difference between popular and scholarly sources.

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This tutorial can serve as a stand-alone tutorial or can be used in the flipped classroom.

Collaborators: 
Suggested Citation: 
Hennig, Nicole. "What Types of Sources Do I Need?." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/what-types-sources-do-i-need.
Submitted by Kendall Faulkner on July 14th, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

Annotated bibliographies have become a popular assignment in college courses and a way to scaffold research papers. Gathering a bibliography before turning in a completed research project allows students to focus on searching strategically and get feedback on the sources they obtained. Annotating that bibliography requires them to think critically about the sources they choose and their relationship to the research at hand. While there are numerous guides and examples that show students the format of an annotation, there are very few that connect annotations to research questions or guide students through making those connections. This lesson plan Uses Joseph Bizup’s BEAM Method from the realm of rhetoric studies to help students think about how sources are used and adds an additional layer of support. This support bridges the gap between a student recognizing a source is generally related to their topic, and thinking critically about how that source is used to answer a research question. 

 

Bizup, Joseph. "BEAM: A rhetorical vocabulary for teaching research-based writing." Rhetoric Review 27, no. 1 (2008): 72-86.

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Handout_AnnotatedBibActivity.docxdisplayed 1372 times20.4 KB
Lesson Plan_Annotated Bibliographies with BEAM.docxdisplayed 1332 times11.99 KB
Slides_BEAMAnnotated Bibliographies.pptxdisplayed 1477 times3.49 MB
Sample Annotated Bibliography-Accessible.docxdisplayed 918 times23.93 KB
Learning Outcomes: 
    • Describe the purpose and structure of an annotated bibliography

    • Analyze an information source for its ability to help answer a research question and articulate that in an annotation. 

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was developed for a History course, and has also worked well in Ethnic and Area Studies classes. 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

The class activity works best when using an assigned source (book, article, primary source, etc.) the students have already read/viewed as part of the class. If you don’t have that option, a book review can be a good stand in and even help students consider how to assess sources before reading them. Alternatively, or a short article or primary source can be used.

Suggested Citation: 
Faulkner, Kendall . "Annotated Bibliographies: Shining a Light on Source Evaluation with the BEAM Method." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/annotated-bibliographies-shining-light-source-evaluation-beam-method.
Submitted by Hillary Richardson on April 21st, 2021
Share this on: 
Short Description: 

This assignment was created to help undergraduate students use research articles to help inform their argument about a "text."  This exercise has been used in library instruction sessions for art history, composition, english literature, women's studies, and history classes. After reflecting on what they know about a text (or image or multimedia), brainstorming search terms, and tracking relevant patterns in search results, students can synthesize information from a variety of sources in an organized, methodological fashion. 

Attachments: 
AttachmentSize
Research Matrix Exercise.pptxdisplayed 1308 times111.33 KB
Research Matrix_handout.docxdisplayed 1133 times369.2 KB
Learning Outcomes: 

Students will be able to brainstorm and refine research topics by brainstorming search terms, identifying relevant resources, and charting related topics

Individual or Group:

Course Context (e.g. how it was implemented or integrated): 

This lesson was originally created to assist with organizing ideas and sources for a literature review, but was edited to simplify objectives and condense the lesson for shorter assignments 

Additional Instructor Resources (e.g. in-class activities, worksheets, scaffolding applications, supplemental modules, further readings, etc.): 

See attached files

Potential Pitfalls and Teaching Tips: 

This can be done for individual students or in small groups. In addition to sending this document directly to students (either as a file or in a printed handout), create separate Google docs (or some other interactive document platform) for them to work in together. 

Suggested Citation: 
Richardson, Hillary. "Research matrix: synthesizing search results." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2021. https://projectcora.org/assignment/research-matrix-synthesizing-search-results.

Pages